Motorcycles have long been associated with freedom, adventure, and rebellion, but not everyone shares the enthusiasm for two-wheeled transportation. Motorcycle detractors and skeptics often cite concerns ranging from safety risks and environmental impact to practicality and social perceptions. One of the most significant reasons people are skeptical about motorcycles is the inherent danger involved. Statistics show that motorcycle riders are far more vulnerable in accidents compared to car drivers, given the lack of protective barriers. Many non-riders believe the risk of severe injuries or fatalities outweighs the thrill and convenience of riding a motorcycle. Some also associate motorcycles with reckless driving, especially due to portrayals in media and personal experiences of witnessing aggressive riders weaving through traffic. Another common criticism comes from a practicality standpoint. Skeptics argue that motorcycles are not suitable for everyday use, particularly in regions with extreme weather conditions. Rain, snow, and even high winds can make riding dangerous or uncomfortable, limiting the feasibility of motorcycles as a primary mode of transport. Additionally, the lack of storage space and the need for protective gear make motorcycles less convenient for commuting, running errands, or carrying passengers. Some individuals also believe that motorcycles contribute to excessive noise pollution, especially when equipped with loud aftermarket exhaust systems. This has led to pushback in residential neighborhoods and urban areas, where people see motorcycles as more of a nuisance than a practical means of transport. Environmental concerns also play a role in motorcycle skepticism. While motorcycles generally consume less fuel than cars, they often produce higher emissions per mile due to less stringent pollution controls. Some environmentally conscious individuals argue that electric vehicles or public transportation offer a greener alternative. Lastly, social and cultural biases shape public perception.